Home / Team Communication / Alternatives to Discord

3 open source alternatives to Discord

Voice, video and text chat — popular with gamers and communities. Here are the open source projects real teams use instead — ranked by fit, with honest pros and cons for each.

What people don't love about Discord

  • Closed ecosystem — you do not own your community data.
  • Ads and promoted servers are growing.
  • Moderation tooling can be limited for large communities.

Current Discord pricing (for reference): Free with Nitro upgrades.

Ad slot — above comparison

Quick comparison

Alternative Best for License Self-host Hosted cloud?
Element (Matrix)
Decentralized messaging on the Matrix protocol.
Decentralized communities that want federation. Apache-2.0 ★★★★☆ Yes
Rocket.Chat
Open source team and community chat with video and voice.
Communities mixing voice, chat and admin controls. MIT (community); proprietary modules available ★★★☆☆ Yes
Mattermost
Slack-style open source team messaging.
Teams graduating from Discord to something business-grade. AGPL-3.0 / Apache-2.0 (modules) ★★★☆☆ Yes

1. Element (Matrix) — Decentralized communities that want federation.

Decentralized messaging on the Matrix protocol.

Strengths

  • Fully federated — you own your data.
  • End-to-end encryption by default.
  • Bridges to Slack, Discord, WhatsApp, etc.

Weaknesses

  • Self-hosting Synapse or Conduit server is work.
  • E2E encryption UX (device verification) can confuse users.
  • Cross-signing and key backup setup is fiddly.
License: Apache-2.0 Self-host difficulty: 4/5 Hosted cloud optionDesktop: Windows, macOS, LinuxMobile: iOS, Android

Element (Matrix) homepage · Source on GitHub · Discord vs Element (Matrix) →

2. Rocket.Chat — Communities mixing voice, chat and admin controls.

Open source team and community chat with video and voice.

Strengths

  • Federation support (via Matrix bridge).
  • {'Large feature set': 'channels, threads, omnichannel.'}
  • Strong customization options.

Weaknesses

  • Can feel heavy for small teams.
  • Past performance issues on large deployments.
  • Resource footprint is higher than competitors.
License: MIT (community); proprietary modules available Self-host difficulty: 3/5 Hosted cloud optionDesktop: Windows, macOS, LinuxMobile: iOS, Android

Rocket.Chat homepage · Source on GitHub · Discord vs Rocket.Chat →

3. Mattermost — Teams graduating from Discord to something business-grade.

Slack-style open source team messaging.

Strengths

  • Familiar Slack-like UX.
  • Strong self-hosting story and enterprise features.
  • Good permission and compliance controls.

Weaknesses

  • Some advanced features require paid tier.
  • Mobile app performance is acceptable but not stellar.
  • Larger install footprint than lightweight chats.
License: AGPL-3.0 / Apache-2.0 (modules) Self-host difficulty: 3/5 Hosted cloud optionDesktop: Windows, macOS, LinuxMobile: iOS, Android

Mattermost homepage · Source on GitHub · Discord vs Mattermost →

Ad slot — below body

Not what you're looking for?

Browse other tools in Team Communication, or check out open source projects by category on the full category index.