3 open source alternatives to Webflow
Visual website builder with CMS and hosting. Here are the open source projects real teams use instead — ranked by fit, with honest pros and cons for each.
What people don't love about Webflow
- Hosting is required — you cannot self-host sites you build.
- Pricing tiers can feel confusing.
- Export gives static HTML, losing CMS features.
Current Webflow pricing (for reference): Free trial; CMS plan from $23/month.
Quick comparison
| Alternative | Best for | License | Self-host | Hosted cloud? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Silex Free and open source website builder in the browser. |
Visual website builder that exports static HTML you can host anywhere. | AGPL-3.0 | ★★☆☆☆ | Yes |
|
GrapesJS Open source drag-and-drop visual builder framework. |
Developers who want to embed a drag-and-drop builder in their app. | BSD-3-Clause | ★★☆☆☆ | Yes |
|
WordPress (self-hosted) The world's most used open source CMS. |
When you want a real CMS plus visual builders like Elementor. | GPL-2.0 | ★★☆☆☆ | Yes |
1. Silex — Visual website builder that exports static HTML you can host anywhere.
Free and open source website builder in the browser.
Strengths
- Works in browser or desktop.
- Exports static HTML — host anywhere.
- No vendor lock-in.
Weaknesses
- Smaller template library than Wix.
- Project maturity varies by area.
- Occasional upgrade friction.
2. GrapesJS — Developers who want to embed a drag-and-drop builder in their app.
Open source drag-and-drop visual builder framework.
Strengths
- Framework-agnostic — embeddable in any app.
- Active community and plugins.
- Exports clean HTML/CSS.
Weaknesses
- Not a turn-key CMS — you integrate it into your app.
- No built-in hosting.
- Documentation is developer-focused.
GrapesJS homepage · Source on GitHub · Webflow vs GrapesJS →
3. WordPress (self-hosted) — When you want a real CMS plus visual builders like Elementor.
The world's most used open source CMS.
Strengths
- Largest theme and plugin ecosystem anywhere.
- Battle-tested for 20+ years.
- Any host works — pick your own provider.
Weaknesses
- Plugin sprawl drives attack surface and bloat.
- Performance depends heavily on caching setup.
- Gutenberg vs classic editor divide persists.
WordPress (self-hosted) homepage · Source on GitHub · Webflow vs WordPress (self-hosted) →
Not what you're looking for?
Browse other tools in Website Builders & CMS, or check out open source projects by category on the full category index.
Other SaaS in Website Builders & CMS
Recommended reading
When self-hosting goes wrong: seven failure modes and how to avoid them
An honest retrospective on the ways self-hosted setups break — not in theory, but in practice — and the small habits that prevent most of them.
Will the open source project you depend on still exist in three years?
Bus factor, maintainer burnout, funding models, and the signals that separate OSS projects that survive from those that quietly decay.
From SaaS to self-hosted: a 30-day migration playbook
A week-by-week plan to move one service off SaaS and onto your own server without breaking your team's workflow.