Home /
Alternatives to InVision /
InVision vs Penpot
InVision vs Penpot
A side-by-side look at InVision (the paid SaaS) and Penpot (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| InVision | Penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Design collaboration, prototyping and whiteboards. | Open source Figma alternative for design-dev collaboration. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | MPL-2.0 |
| Pricing | Freehand Basic free; Pro from $4.95/user/month (limited availability 2024+). | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
The InVision replacement for design and prototyping.
Penpot strengths
- Strong Figma-like UX with design tokens.
- SVG-native — developer-friendly exports.
- Self-hostable for confidential work.
Penpot weaknesses
- Plugin ecosystem is newer.
- Performance on very large files lags Figma.
- Collaboration UX still maturing.
What's the catch with InVision?
- InVision shuttered its core prototyping product in late 2024.
- Users are actively searching for replacements.
- Data export and migration were messy.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to InVision: see InVision alternatives, or learn more about Penpot on its project page.