Home /
Alternatives to Linear /
Linear vs Plane
Linear vs Plane
A side-by-side look at Linear (the paid SaaS) and Plane (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Linear | Plane | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Streamlined issue tracking built for software teams. | Open source JIRA alternative with cycles and modules. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free up to 10 users; Standard from $8/user/month. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
The closest drop-in for Linear's modern issue-tracking feel.
Plane strengths
- Modern UI inspired by Linear/Jira.
- Cycles, modules and views.
- Active community and rapid updates.
Plane weaknesses
- Still adding features at pace — occasional rough edges.
- Self-hosted setup involves several services.
- Fewer integrations than mature incumbents.
What's the catch with Linear?
- Opinionated — if Linear's model doesn't fit, there's friction.
- Cloud-only — no self-host option at any price.
- Minimal customization compared to Jira.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Linear: see Linear alternatives, or learn more about Plane on its project page.