Home /
Alternatives to Microsoft Teams /
Microsoft Teams vs Rocket.Chat
Microsoft Teams vs Rocket.Chat
A side-by-side look at Microsoft Teams (the paid SaaS) and Rocket.Chat (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Microsoft Teams | Rocket.Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Video, chat and collaboration bundled with Microsoft 365. | Open source team and community chat with video and voice. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | MIT (community); proprietary modules available |
| Pricing | Included in Microsoft 365 from $6.99/month; Teams Essentials from $4/user/month standalone. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | iOS, Android |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Large organizations with omnichannel and complex permissions.
Rocket.Chat strengths
- Federation support (via Matrix bridge).
- {'Large feature set': 'channels, threads, omnichannel.'}
- Strong customization options.
Rocket.Chat weaknesses
- Can feel heavy for small teams.
- Past performance issues on large deployments.
- Resource footprint is higher than competitors.
What's the catch with Microsoft Teams?
- Deeply tied to Microsoft ecosystem.
- Resource-heavy desktop client.
- Chat and meeting features sprawl across tabs.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Microsoft Teams: see Microsoft Teams alternatives, or learn more about Rocket.Chat on its project page.