Home /
Alternatives to Netlify /
Netlify vs Dokku
Netlify vs Dokku
A side-by-side look at Netlify (the paid SaaS) and Dokku (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Netlify | Dokku | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Jamstack hosting with Git-based deploys, functions and forms. | Self-hosted mini-Heroku on a single server. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | MIT |
| Pricing | Free tier; Pro from $19/user/month; bandwidth overages sting. | Free to self-host |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 2/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | No |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Heroku buildpacks and a tiny footprint on a single cheap server.
Dokku strengths
- Deploy via git push, just like Heroku.
- Works on any Linux VPS.
- Plugin ecosystem for databases, SSL, etc.
Dokku weaknesses
- Single-host — limited scaling story.
- Requires Linux sysadmin comfort.
- UI is CLI-first.
What's the catch with Netlify?
- Bandwidth and build-minute overages on viral spikes.
- Edge functions and large media have extra per-request costs.
- Roadmap keeps shifting toward higher-tier enterprise features.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Netlify: see Netlify alternatives, or learn more about Dokku on its project page.
Recommended reading
When self-hosting goes wrong: seven failure modes and how to avoid them
An honest retrospective on the ways self-hosted setups break — not in theory, but in practice — and the small habits that prevent most of them.
Will the open source project you depend on still exist in three years?
Bus factor, maintainer burnout, funding models, and the signals that separate OSS projects that survive from those that quietly decay.
From SaaS to self-hosted: a 30-day migration playbook
A week-by-week plan to move one service off SaaS and onto your own server without breaking your team's workflow.