Home / Alternatives to Substack / Substack vs Ghost (self-hosted)

Substack vs Ghost (self-hosted)

A side-by-side look at Substack (the paid SaaS) and Ghost (self-hosted) (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.

Substack Ghost (self-hosted)
Tagline Hosted newsletter platform with paid subscriptions built in. Modern open source publishing platform with paid newsletters.
License Proprietary SaaS MIT
Pricing Free to start; Substack takes 10% of subscription revenue plus Stripe fees. Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan
Self-host option No Yes — difficulty 2/5
Hosted cloud available Yes (only option) Yes
Desktop apps Varies by product Windows, macOS, Linux
Mobile apps Official apps typically available iOS, Android
Ad slot — between tables

Best for

Paid newsletters and members with a polished editor and native Stripe billing.

Ghost (self-hosted) strengths

  • Clean, writer-first editor.
  • Built-in newsletter and memberships.
  • Self-host or paid managed hosting.

Ghost (self-hosted) weaknesses

  • Smaller plugin ecosystem than WordPress.
  • Themes require handlebars knowledge.
  • Self-host requires Node.js + MySQL setup.

What's the catch with Substack?

  • 10% revenue cut is expensive at scale vs. self-hosted Ghost or Listmonk.
  • Content moderation policies have pushed some creators off-platform.
  • You don't own your mailing list the same way you would on your own infra.

Still unsure?

Check the full list of alternatives to Substack: see Substack alternatives, or learn more about Ghost (self-hosted) on its project page.