Home / AI Coding Assistants / Alternatives to GitHub Copilot

3 open source alternatives to GitHub Copilot

AI pair programmer trained on public code. Here are the open source projects real teams use instead — ranked by fit, with honest pros and cons for each.

What people don't love about GitHub Copilot

  • Code sent to Microsoft/OpenAI for completions.
  • Subscription-only.
  • Licensing questions around training data still unresolved for some teams.

Current GitHub Copilot pricing (for reference): Individual $10/month; Business $19/user/month.

Ad slot — above comparison

Quick comparison

Alternative Best for License Self-host Hosted cloud?
Continue
Open source alternative to GitHub Copilot — run any model.
Keep using Copilot-style IDE assistance with any LLM of your choice. Apache-2.0 ★☆☆☆☆ Self-host only
Aider
AI pair programming in your terminal.
Terminal power users who want AI edits and auto-commits. Apache-2.0 ★☆☆☆☆ Self-host only
Tabby
Self-hosted AI coding assistant you can run on your own GPU.
Teams that need fully self-hosted completions on their own GPU. Apache-2.0 (community) / commercial (enterprise) ★★★☆☆ Self-host only

1. Continue — Keep using Copilot-style IDE assistance with any LLM of your choice.

Open source alternative to GitHub Copilot — run any model.

Strengths

  • Works with VS Code and JetBrains IDEs.
  • Bring your own model — OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama, etc.
  • Keeps code local — no required cloud.

Weaknesses

  • Requires you to manage model access/keys.
  • Cold-start setup takes effort compared to Copilot.
  • Community plugins still stabilizing.
License: Apache-2.0 Self-host difficulty: 1/5 Desktop: Windows, macOS, Linux

Continue homepage · Source on GitHub · GitHub Copilot vs Continue →

2. Aider — Terminal power users who want AI edits and auto-commits.

AI pair programming in your terminal.

Strengths

  • Git-aware — edits files and commits for you.
  • Works with any OpenAI-compatible model.
  • Lightweight — runs as a CLI.

Weaknesses

  • Terminal-based — no GUI for editors.
  • Model API usage costs can climb on large repos.
  • Not a code-completion tool (different UX from Copilot).
License: Apache-2.0 Self-host difficulty: 1/5 Desktop: Windows, macOS, Linux

Aider homepage · Source on GitHub · GitHub Copilot vs Aider →

3. Tabby — Teams that need fully self-hosted completions on their own GPU.

Self-hosted AI coding assistant you can run on your own GPU.

Strengths

  • Fully self-hosted code completion.
  • VS Code, IntelliJ, vim extensions.
  • Runs on consumer GPUs with quantized models.

Weaknesses

  • GPU strongly recommended for good latency.
  • Larger install footprint.
  • Enterprise features gated.
License: Apache-2.0 (community) / commercial (enterprise) Self-host difficulty: 3/5

Tabby homepage · Source on GitHub · GitHub Copilot vs Tabby →

Ad slot — below body

Not what you're looking for?

Browse other tools in AI Coding Assistants, or check out open source projects by category on the full category index.