Home /
Alternatives to GitHub Copilot /
GitHub Copilot vs Tabby
GitHub Copilot vs Tabby
A side-by-side look at GitHub Copilot (the paid SaaS) and Tabby (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| GitHub Copilot | Tabby | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | AI pair programmer trained on public code. | Self-hosted AI coding assistant you can run on your own GPU. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | Apache-2.0 (community) / commercial (enterprise) |
| Pricing | Individual $10/month; Business $19/user/month. | Free to self-host |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | No |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Teams that need fully self-hosted completions on their own GPU.
Tabby strengths
- Fully self-hosted code completion.
- VS Code, IntelliJ, vim extensions.
- Runs on consumer GPUs with quantized models.
Tabby weaknesses
- GPU strongly recommended for good latency.
- Larger install footprint.
- Enterprise features gated.
What's the catch with GitHub Copilot?
- Code sent to Microsoft/OpenAI for completions.
- Subscription-only.
- Licensing questions around training data still unresolved for some teams.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to GitHub Copilot: see GitHub Copilot alternatives, or learn more about Tabby on its project page.
Recommended reading
When self-hosting goes wrong: seven failure modes and how to avoid them
An honest retrospective on the ways self-hosted setups break — not in theory, but in practice — and the small habits that prevent most of them.
Will the open source project you depend on still exist in three years?
Bus factor, maintainer burnout, funding models, and the signals that separate OSS projects that survive from those that quietly decay.
From SaaS to self-hosted: a 30-day migration playbook
A week-by-week plan to move one service off SaaS and onto your own server without breaking your team's workflow.