Home /
Alternatives to Buffer /
Buffer vs Mixpost
Buffer vs Mixpost
A side-by-side look at Buffer (the paid SaaS) and Mixpost (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Buffer | Mixpost | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Schedule social media posts across networks. | Self-hosted social media scheduler. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | MIT (lite) / commercial (Pro) |
| Pricing | Free up to 3 channels; Essentials from $6/channel/month. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 2/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Self-hosted scheduler with modern UX and multi-platform preview.
Mixpost strengths
- Modern UI with preview across platforms.
- Supports Twitter/X, LinkedIn, Facebook, Mastodon, etc.
- Free self-host tier (lite).
Mixpost weaknesses
- Advanced features (team workflows, analytics) in paid Pro.
- Laravel stack — PHP install.
- Smaller integration list than Buffer.
What's the catch with Buffer?
- Per-channel pricing adds up fast.
- Lost features over years as it trimmed scope.
- Cloud-only.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Buffer: see Buffer alternatives, or learn more about Mixpost on its project page.