Home /
Alternatives to Buffer /
Buffer vs Postiz
Buffer vs Postiz
A side-by-side look at Buffer (the paid SaaS) and Postiz (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Buffer | Postiz | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Schedule social media posts across networks. | Ultimate AI social media scheduling tool, open source. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | AGPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | Free up to 3 channels; Essentials from $6/channel/month. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 2/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
AI-assisted social media scheduling with a Next.js stack.
Postiz strengths
- Built with modern Next.js stack.
- AI-assisted caption generation.
- Team collaboration on scheduling.
Postiz weaknesses
- Younger project — features evolving.
- Self-host has multiple services (DB, Redis, queue).
- Some AI features gated on cloud plans.
What's the catch with Buffer?
- Per-channel pricing adds up fast.
- Lost features over years as it trimmed scope.
- Cloud-only.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Buffer: see Buffer alternatives, or learn more about Postiz on its project page.