Home /
Alternatives to Make (formerly Integromat) /
Make (formerly Integromat) vs Activepieces
Make (formerly Integromat) vs Activepieces
A side-by-side look at Make (formerly Integromat) (the paid SaaS) and Activepieces (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Make (formerly Integromat) | Activepieces | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Visual automation builder. | Open source Zapier alternative with MIT license. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | MIT |
| Pricing | Free tier; Core from $9/month. | Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 2/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Cleaner MIT-licensed alternative with a modern UI.
Activepieces strengths
- Properly MIT-licensed and open.
- Visual flows with branching and loops.
- TypeScript-based custom pieces.
Activepieces weaknesses
- Smaller integration catalogue than Zapier or n8n.
- Newer project — breaking changes occur.
- Cloud pricing tiers still evolving.
What's the catch with Make (formerly Integromat)?
- Pricing based on operations, not tasks — confusing.
- Learning curve for complex scenarios.
- Not self-hostable.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Make (formerly Integromat): see Make (formerly Integromat) alternatives, or learn more about Activepieces on its project page.