Home /
Alternatives to Make (formerly Integromat) /
Make (formerly Integromat) vs Huginn
Make (formerly Integromat) vs Huginn
A side-by-side look at Make (formerly Integromat) (the paid SaaS) and Huginn (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Make (formerly Integromat) | Huginn | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Visual automation builder. | Self-hosted "agents" that watch, scrape and act. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | MIT |
| Pricing | Free tier; Core from $9/month. | Free to self-host |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 3/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | No |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Web only |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | None official |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Long-running monitors and scheduled agents.
Huginn strengths
- Built for IFTTT-style feed monitoring and actions.
- Huge agent library for feeds, weather, email.
- Long-running, stable project.
Huginn weaknesses
- Ruby/Rails stack can feel heavy.
- UI is functional, not polished.
- Not beginner-friendly.
What's the catch with Make (formerly Integromat)?
- Pricing based on operations, not tasks — confusing.
- Learning curve for complex scenarios.
- Not self-hostable.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Make (formerly Integromat): see Make (formerly Integromat) alternatives, or learn more about Huginn on its project page.