Home / Alternatives to Okta / Okta vs Authentik

Okta vs Authentik

A side-by-side look at Okta (the paid SaaS) and Authentik (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.

Okta Authentik
Tagline Enterprise identity, SSO and MFA cloud. Modern identity provider with a polished admin UI.
License Proprietary SaaS MIT
Pricing SSO from $2/user/month; MFA, Lifecycle Management tiers climb quickly. Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan
Self-host option No Yes — difficulty 3/5
Hosted cloud available Yes (only option) Yes
Desktop apps Varies by product Web only
Mobile apps Official apps typically available None official
Ad slot — between tables

Best for

A modern admin UX and flow-based policies without the Keycloak learning curve.

Authentik strengths

  • SAML, OIDC, LDAP, proxy-auth flows in one binary.
  • Flow-based policies make complex auth readable.
  • Active development and friendly docs.

Authentik weaknesses

  • Newer than Keycloak — fewer integrations in the wild.
  • Some enterprise features are Enterprise-tier only.
  • Postgres + Redis + worker — still multi-service to operate.

What's the catch with Okta?

  • Per-user per-feature pricing balloons past 200 seats.
  • Every outage takes down everything your team signs into.
  • Breach history has eroded trust for security-conscious teams.

Still unsure?

Check the full list of alternatives to Okta: see Okta alternatives, or learn more about Authentik on its project page.