Home / Alternatives to Okta / Okta vs Zitadel

Okta vs Zitadel

A side-by-side look at Okta (the paid SaaS) and Zitadel (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.

Okta Zitadel
Tagline Enterprise identity, SSO and MFA cloud. Cloud-native identity platform built in Go with event sourcing.
License Proprietary SaaS Apache-2.0
Pricing SSO from $2/user/month; MFA, Lifecycle Management tiers climb quickly. Free to self-host · optional paid hosted plan
Self-host option No Yes — difficulty 3/5
Hosted cloud available Yes (only option) Yes
Desktop apps Varies by product Web only
Mobile apps Official apps typically available None official
Ad slot — between tables

Best for

Multi-tenant B2B SaaS builders who want event-sourced identity.

Zitadel strengths

  • Multi-tenant from day one — good for B2B SaaS builders.
  • Event-sourced audit trail for compliance.
  • Swiss hosted option if you prefer managed.

Zitadel weaknesses

  • Younger than Keycloak — integration guides are thinner.
  • Operational model differs from traditional IAM.
  • Advanced features (actions, custom flows) still maturing.

What's the catch with Okta?

  • Per-user per-feature pricing balloons past 200 seats.
  • Every outage takes down everything your team signs into.
  • Breach history has eroded trust for security-conscious teams.

Still unsure?

Check the full list of alternatives to Okta: see Okta alternatives, or learn more about Zitadel on its project page.