Home /
Alternatives to Adobe Photoshop /
Adobe Photoshop vs Krita
Adobe Photoshop vs Krita
A side-by-side look at Adobe Photoshop (the paid SaaS) and Krita (the open source alternative). Use this page to decide if the switch fits your team and workflow.
| Adobe Photoshop | Krita | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | Industry-standard raster image editor. | Open source digital painting and illustration. |
| License | Proprietary SaaS | GPL-3.0 |
| Pricing | From $22.99/month (single app). | Free to self-host |
| Self-host option | No | Yes — difficulty 1/5 |
| Hosted cloud available | Yes (only option) | No |
| Desktop apps | Varies by product | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Mobile apps | Official apps typically available | Android |
Ad slot — between tables
Best for
Digital painting, illustration and concept art.
Krita strengths
- Built for illustrators and concept artists.
- Rich brush engine and animation support.
- Regular releases with bug fixes.
Krita weaknesses
- Not built for photo editing workflows.
- Performance on very large canvases varies.
- No desktop subscription means slower paid support paths.
What's the catch with Adobe Photoshop?
- Subscription pricing — you never own the software.
- Heavy install; requires powerful machine.
- Steep learning curve.
Still unsure?
Check the full list of alternatives to Adobe Photoshop: see Adobe Photoshop alternatives, or learn more about Krita on its project page.
Recommended reading
When self-hosting goes wrong: seven failure modes and how to avoid them
An honest retrospective on the ways self-hosted setups break — not in theory, but in practice — and the small habits that prevent most of them.
Will the open source project you depend on still exist in three years?
Bus factor, maintainer burnout, funding models, and the signals that separate OSS projects that survive from those that quietly decay.
From SaaS to self-hosted: a 30-day migration playbook
A week-by-week plan to move one service off SaaS and onto your own server without breaking your team's workflow.